LIGHTROOM VERSUS PHOTO MECHANIC PROFESSIONAL

If you want your color labels to be visible in other Adobe applications, such as Bridge and Lightroom, be sure that the values for each of these are aligned with the other programs you are using. Lightroom is great for keywording, filtering, and organizing. Like you go back to Yosemite and shoot the same subjects and hence can use a template with location info, etc. These metadata values are actually stored as text labels, so it's the name that appears in the field that makes a difference, not the color indicator. Photo Mechanic is great, but you have to be very disciplined about applying metadata, and it works best with repetitive metadata. By contrast, Photo Mechanic rates 4.8/5 stars. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic rates 4.6/5 stars with 652 reviews. If you want the color labels you apply with Photo Mechanic to be viewed in other Applications, such as Adobe Bridge or Lightroom, then you need to modify the preferences. based on preference data from user reviews. If you capture Raw files, and use an Adobe-based workflow вЂ“ in which you will process the files in Lightroom or Adobe Camera Raw вЂ“ then you will want to set up Photo Mechanic so it only writes metadata to an XMP sidecar file for Raw images.

You really need to invest a few minutes up front to configure preferences and test the resulting files to ensure metadata values are written in a way that will be read correctly further on in your particular workflow. It is very flexible in how it reads and writes metadata values with both the legacy form of IPTC and with XMP. Tyler nails down 5 areas that Lightroom is weak in, and discusses how Photo Mechanic fits their needs in those areas. Luminar is also a one-time purchase model that makes it better for professional.

LIGHTROOM VERSUS PHOTO MECHANIC PROFESSIONAL

Luminar also features a much easier to use interface, than Lightroom, with one-click artificial intelligence that benefits professional photographers. Photo Mechanic really stresses the 'mechanic' part of its name. TylerвЂ™s military documentation group and AP photographers are required to complete no less than 17 metadata fields in order to submit images to the Pentagon and National Archives. The main difference between Luminar and Lightroom is that Luminar has a faster editing process than Lightroom. Disclaimer: I've never used PM but intend to take a look - and my 70 number is totally made up, but. PM seems to operate with 70 less overhead and is apparently much faster for the initial cull than LR. In a nutshell, Lightroom is a nondestructive photo workflow, adjustment, and management program, while Photoshop is a pixel-level, layer-based image manipulation program.

It's important to note how Photo Mechanic adds metadata to such files depends on the options set in its application preferences. mphocus wrote: PM to cull then over to Lightroom for organizing.

Lightroom versus photo mechanic